On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 2:57 PM Barry Leiba wrote:
> Hi, Mario and Vijay.
>
> 7942 says that the Implementation Status section is inappropriate to
> include in an RFC because it’s transient information that changes, and is
> usually obsolete quickly.
>
> But I don’t interpret Vijay’s suggestion a
Dear Mario: Works for me. Thank you! I much appreciate your attention to
my comments. I have no further comments on the new version.
Cheers,
- vijay
On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 1:49 AM Mario Loffredo
wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> this new version includes the changes suggested by the Gen-ART reviewe
Reviewer: Vijay Gurbani
Review result: Ready with Nits
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For
