Howdy,
A reviewer of this draft suggested that it would be useful to have it
reviewed by this list as well. If you have thoughts on suggestions on it,
please let me know.
best regards,
Ted Hardie
-- Forwarded message --
From:
Date: Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 9:08 AM
Subject: New
Sorry for the delay in replying; I was returning from the QUIC meeting in
Melbourne.
On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 7:13 AM, John C Klensin wrote:
>
>
> --On Thursday, January 25, 2018 14:55 +0100 Frank Ellermann
> wrote:
>
> > On 22 January 2018, Ted Hardie wrote:
>
On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 11:27 AM, John C Klensin wrote:
>
> >> Unless there are considerations that I don't understand, I
> >> agree with Frank and would go a step further. While the
> >> document indicates that IRIS was not actually deployed for
> >> address registry usage, as far as I know it
Howdy,
I note John suggests a reference to either RFC 8499 or RFC 5980. The
latter is almost certainly meant to be RFC 5890, since that is the
definitions and document framework for the IDNA 2008 series. I would
disagree, however, that this is a useful reference, since neither RFC 5980
or RFC 59
