Re: [regext] [Ext] Robert Wilton's Discuss on draft-ietf-regext-rdap-reverse-search-24: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2023-08-23 Thread Amanda Baber
Regarding the use of a brief description in the registry itself as the "Specification" in "Specification Required": I missed it this time, but we ran into this same question with draft-ietf-calext-jscalendar-21, and FWIW, Barry Leiba recommended to the author that the registration procedure be c

Re: [regext] [Ext] Robert Wilton's Discuss on draft-ietf-regext-rdap-reverse-search-24: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2023-08-24 Thread Amanda Baber
pecifically meant to encompass non-RFC documentation (see Section 4 of RFC 8126 for registration procedure definitions), but no problem at all with including it. Thanks, Amanda On 8/24/23, 9:18 AM, "iesg on behalf of Mario Loffredo" wrote: Hi Amanda, Il 23/08/2023

[regext] [IANA #1046536] misspelled value in the RDAP JSON values registry

2018-01-23 Thread Amanda Baber via RT
Hi Andy, Thanks for catching this. The RDAP JSON Values entry for "administrative" is now spelled correctly: https://www.iana.org/assignments/rdap-json-values Best regards, Amanda Baber Lead IANA Services Specialist On Fri Jan 19 21:17:00 2018, a...@hxr.us wrote: > Hello, >

[regext] [IANA #1050124] Re: misspelled value in the RDAP JSON values registry

2018-02-16 Thread Amanda Baber via RT
Dear Bernhard, Thank you for catching this. The typo has been corrected: https://www.iana.org/assignments/rdap-json-values Best regards, Amanda Baber Lead IANA Services Specialist On Wed Feb 14 12:34:22 2018, rep.dot@gmail.com wrote: > On 23 January 2018 at 20:32, Amanda Baber via RT