Dear Tim Bray, Martin Thomson (cc: regext WG),
As the designated experts for the ns and schema registries, can you review the
proposed registrations in draft-ietf-regext-epp-ttl-10 for us? Please see
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-epp-ttl/
The due date is November 22nd.
If
Dear Scott Hollenbeck (cc: regext WG),
As the designated experts for the Extensions for the Extensible Provisioning
Protocol (EPP) registry, can you review the proposed registration in
draft-ietf-regext-epp-ttl-17 for us? Please see
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-epp-ttl/
T
Hi Scott,
Just to note, you last reviewed -15 and it looks like the author addressed your
feedback from that review, but we will wait for your approval again.
Best regards,
David Dong
IANA Services Sr. Specialist
On Fri Nov 08 20:47:48 2024, david.dong wrote:
> Dear Scott Hollenbeck (cc: regex
Hi Tim, Martin,
Just to note, you had last reviewed -15, and it looks like the author had
addressed your feedback from that review.
Best regards,
David Dong
IANA Services Sr. Specialist
On Fri Nov 08 20:25:58 2024, david.dong wrote:
> Dear Tim Bray, Martin Thomson (cc: regext WG),
>
> As the
After Jim Goulds presentation on implementing EoH and EoQ I was inspired to
start hacking on the two protocols in our own EPP server implementation, while
doing so, some questions about EoH popped up.
In the EoH draft there is a couple of MUSTs for the client when sending a
request:
- The GET
