[regext] Re: Call for agenda items IETF 121

Dear all, I have posted a preliminary agenda in the datatracker for IETF 121: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/agenda-121-regext/ If you have requested any time on the agenda please verify your item is there. I would like to apologise in adv

[regext] Re: Extension Identifiers in draft-ietf-regext-rdap-rir-search

Hi Jasdip, I think "re-using" wouldn't be the right statement. To me it seem that relation search is actually defining a certain extension functionality of an existing search path segment /domains. This is however only implicit, because rfc9082 is actually not defining if a path segment below

[regext] Re: [Ext] Re: WGLC: draft-ietf-regext-rdap-geofeed-05

Hi Jim, I submitted my writeup this afternoon. During my review I identified some issues which the authors addressed in draft-ietf-regext-rdap-geofeed-08. The changes made are not material as they don't affect any normative text. G. > On 14 Oct 2024, at 15:00, James Galvin wrote: > > There

[regext] Domain Connect Protocol

Hi, I've begun AD Sponsoring: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-kowalik-domainconnect/ This document has previously been discussed in both REGEXT and DNSOP, I've included some references in the data tracker history if you are interested. I'm seeking a document shepherd volunteer, please mes

[regext] Re: [art] Domain Connect Protocol

Hiya, I had a quick scan and have a couple of initial questions: I'm working on [1] so wonder if/how those may be related, any idea? If not, should they be? I'm also not clear on the status of this - is this a case of wanting to get something long-used under IETF change control or something el

[regext] Re: Extension Identifiers in draft-ietf-regext-rdap-rir-search

Hi Pawel, On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 09:29:49AM +0200, kowa...@denic.de wrote: > The ambiguity seems to be also there because /domains path segment > is used the same in both context of RIR and domain name registry. > The draft puts however RIR in focus. This poses an interesting > question - if a do

[regext] Re: Extension Identifiers in draft-ietf-regext-rdap-rir-search

Hi Tom, On 21.10.24 23:57, Tom Harrison wrote: Hi Pawel, On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 09:29:49AM +0200,kowa...@denic.de wrote: [...] In the absence of any text permitting partial implementation, this text requires implementers to implement the whole document ("the functionality specified in this doc