[regext] Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-regext-rdap-x-media-type-02.txt

2024-10-17 Thread Gould, James
Andy, I'll provide a full review, but upon my initial review draft-ietf-regext-rdap-x-media-type-02 still doesn't support the Extension Version Identifier in draft-ietf-regext-rdap-versioning, following the ABNF: extension-version-identifier = identifier versioning identifier = ALPHA *( ALPHA /

[regext] Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-regext-rdap-x-media-type-02.txt

2024-10-17 Thread Andrew Newton (andy)
Hi all, We have updated this draft based on feedback from this working group, including a section on how this draft works with the versioning draft. Additionally, we have added many examples. Many thanks to those who have provided feedback. -andy On 10/17/24 06:55, internet-dra...@ietf.org

[regext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-regext-rdap-x-media-type-02.txt

2024-10-17 Thread internet-drafts
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-regext-rdap-x-media-type-02.txt is now available. It is a work item of the Registration Protocols Extensions (REGEXT) WG of the IETF. Title: An RDAP With Extensions Media Type Authors: Andy Newton Jasdip Singh Name:draft-ietf-regext-rdap-x-media

[regext] Re: Call for agenda items IETF 121

2024-10-17 Thread Victor Zhou
Dear REGEXT WG and chairs, Could we have 10min to talk about rfc-draft-AuthCodeSEC: https://github.com/xinbenlv/rfc-draft-authcodesec/blob/main/README.md Victor Zhou, Building Namefi (https://namefi.io) by D3Serve Labs Inc (https://d3serve.xyz ) --- Dear REGEXT WG, This is a call for agenda

[regext] Re: Call for agenda items IETF 121

2024-10-17 Thread Joseph Yee
Will EPP-Variant ( https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-galvin-regext-epp-variants/) be discussed in IETF121? Thanks Joseph On Wed, Oct 2, 2024 at 10:07 AM Andrew Newton (andy) wrote: > Hi, > > Could we have some time to discuss the rdap-extensions draft? > > -andy > > On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 a

[regext] Re: normative language and references in draft-ietf-regext-delete-bcp

2024-10-17 Thread Andrew Newton (andy)
This is done. In addition, I noted the informative reference to RFC 3915 has changed to normative. However, during my review of the traffic on this list, it appears there was a tacit agreement on changing some of the normative language. See: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/regext/mcMbVUspJu