Hi,
Could we have some time to discuss the rdap-extensions draft?
-andy
On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 9:45 AM Antoin Verschuren
wrote:
>
> Dear REGEXT WG,
>
> This is a call for agenda items for IETF 121.
> Just as last time, we will have 2 slots in Dublin.
> 1 hour for administrative items and a 2 h
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-regext-rdap-jscontact-19.txt is now available. It is
a work item of the Registration Protocols Extensions (REGEXT) WG of the IETF.
Title: Using JSContact in Registration Data Access Protocol (RDAP) JSON
Responses
Authors: Mario Loffredo
Gavin Brown
I've read draft-ietf-regext-rdap-extensions-04 completely and have several
comments to share. An overarching comment is that any update to Standard 95
responses means that the modified responses will not be consistent with
"rdap_level_0". A new identifier will be needed. I'd very much prefer to
Hi Andy,
please find my comments below.
Il 02/10/2024 16:24, Andrew Newton (andy) ha scritto:
On Tue, Oct 1, 2024 at 3:53 AM Mario Loffredo wrote:
Hi Andy and Jasdip,
have some questions about draft-ietf-regext-rdap-x-media-type:
1) rdap_level_0 is included in "extensions" parameter, but it
On Tue, Oct 1, 2024 at 3:53 AM Mario Loffredo wrote:
>
> Hi Andy and Jasdip,
>
>
> have some questions about draft-ietf-regext-rdap-x-media-type:
>
> 1) rdap_level_0 is included in "extensions" parameter, but it's not an
> extension, i.e. it's not included in the RDAP Extensions registry. Should
