Hi Antoin, Jim,
Though not for agenda, couple of items:
* Now that draft-ietf-regext-rdap-rir-search-09 and
draft-ietf-regext-rdap-geofeed-07 are past the WGLC period, would appreciate
knowing about the next step(s).
* Noticed that draft-ietf-regext-rdap-rir-search-09 recently expired.
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Newton (andy)
> Sent: Monday, September 30, 2024 5:52 PM
> To: Hollenbeck, Scott
> Cc: jgould=40verisign@dmarc.ietf.org; gal...@elistx.com; regext-
> cha...@ietf.org; regext@ietf.org
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] Re: request for wglc
>
> Cautio
Hi Antoin, I'd like to present draft-brown-rdap-ttl-extension.
Thanks,
Gavin.
> On 30 Sep 2024, at 14:44, Antoin Verschuren
> wrote:
>
> Dear REGEXT WG,
>
> This is a call for agenda items for IETF 121.
> Just as last time, we will have 2 slots in Dublin.
> 1 hour for administrative items a
Hi Antoin,
would like to have 10 minutes to talk about the rdap-jscontact doc.
I'll post a new version to support the discussion shortly.
Still don't know if I'll attend in person.
Best,
Mario
Il 30/09/2024 15:44, Antoin Verschuren ha scritto:
Dear REGEXT WG,
This is a call for agenda i
Hi Andy and Jasdip,
have some questions about draft-ietf-regext-rdap-x-media-type:
1) rdap_level_0 is included in "extensions" parameter, but it's not an
extension, i.e. it's not included in the RDAP Extensions registry. Should it be removed?
2) If rdap_level_0 is an extension, is it required