Internet-Draft draft-ietf-regext-epp-eai-22.txt is now available. It is a work
item of the Registration Protocols Extensions (REGEXT) WG of the IETF.
Title: Use of Internationalized Email Addresses in the Extensible
Provisioning Protocol (EPP)
Authors: Dmitry Belyavskiy
James
I have two items that are either candidates for agenda time (if there's
something to discuss) or chair action before the meeting:
draft-ietf-regext-delete-bcp: waiting on chair action after the editors and
shepherd completed requested actions regarding normative language in the draft.
draft-iet
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-regext-rdap-extensions-04.txt is now available. It
is a work item of the Registration Protocols Extensions (REGEXT) WG of the
IETF.
Title: RDAP Extensions
Authors: Andy Newton
Jasdip Singh
Tom Harrison
Name:draft-ietf-regext-rdap-ext
Hi,
This version re-organizes the content and rewards some text for
readability purposes. The only material change is the removal of the
reserved double underscore syntax since it is not being utilized by
the versioning draft.
The authors believe this draft is ready for working group last call.
Dear REGEXT WG,
This is a call for agenda items for IETF 121.
Just as last time, we will have 2 slots in Dublin.
1 hour for administrative items and a 2 hour slot for new work with more
technical in dept presentations.
Please send any requests to the chairs or respond to this email.
Please for
The Chairs want to acknowledge this request and note that we are aware this is
v04, which is the version that we will shortly bring to WGLC.
Thanks,
Antoin and Jim
On 19 Sep 2024, at 13:15, Andrew Newton (andy) wrote:
> Hello chairs,
>
> Version -03 of draft-ietf-regext-rdap-extensions incor
I'd like to echo something that Jim Gould noted below. As currently written,
the document proposes to update RFCs 7480, 9082, 9083. They're all part of
Standard 95. I'd REALLY like to see more discussion of the draft, though I will
note that expressions of support or concern can be made during t
Thanks to Jim and Scott.
The Chairs will wait for additional discussion before moving forward with WGLC.
Antoin and Jim
On 30 Sep 2024, at 15:36, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote:
> I'd like to echo something that Jim Gould noted below. As currently written,
> the document proposes to update RFCs 748
Jim,
I haven't had the opportunity to review -04 and I don't support starting a WGLC
yet. I will do a detailed review of -04 shortly and provide feedback on the
mailing list. I want to ensure that the draft-ietf-regext-rdap-extensions
scope is correct, the content matches the scope, and the c
On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 3:36 PM Hollenbeck, Scott
wrote:
>
> I am myself guilty of not providing recent feedback. I'll take care of that
> soon.
Many thanks, Scott. Given our close proximity to IETF 121, do you
think this deserves agenda time?
-andy
10 matches
Mail list logo
