Andy,
That language looks better. I believe it would be good for
draft-ietf-regext-rdap-extensions to cover how new RDAP JSON Values types are
defined. The RDAP JSON Values registry can be extended by Type and by Value.
The definition of a new RDAP JSON Values type could include the expected
On 9/5/24 07:54, Gould, James wrote:
Andy,
That language looks better. I believe it would be good for draft-ietf-regext-rdap-extensions to
cover how new RDAP JSON Values types are defined. The RDAP JSON Values registry can be extended by
Type and by Value. The definition of a new RDAP JSON
