[regext] Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-newton-regext-rdap-considerations-on-rfc9537-00.txt

2024-06-21 Thread Andrew Newton (andy)
On 6/20/24 16:39, rcar...@godaddy.com wrote: I was not sure if I should reply to this thread or the "Simple" thread but as the "Simple" thread appears to be a product of this one, I thought I would post here. Several years ago, there were many discussions (in the REGEXT WG, the RDAP WG and

[regext] Re: Simple Redaction

2024-06-21 Thread kowalik
Hi Andy, Taking into account that this proposal is a result of considerations on rfc9537 I think this draft takes the issue too simplified or easy, just by removing the difficult part of the problem in rfc9537. Actually it dictates allowed methods how redaction is done by the server, practic

[regext] Re: Simple Redaction

2024-06-21 Thread Andrew Newton (andy)
On 6/21/24 09:32, kowa...@denic.de wrote: Hi Andy, Taking into account that this proposal is a result of considerations on rfc9537 I think this draft takes the issue too simplified or easy, just by removing the difficult part of the problem in rfc9537. If you are saying that this draft is t

[regext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-regext-epp-delete-bcp-04.txt

2024-06-21 Thread internet-drafts
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-regext-epp-delete-bcp-04.txt is now available. It is a work item of the Registration Protocols Extensions (REGEXT) WG of the IETF. Title: Best Practices for Deletion of Domain and Host Objects in the Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) Authors: Scott Hollenbec

[regext] Re: WGLC: draft-ietf-regext-epp-delete-bcp-03

2024-06-21 Thread Carroll, William
Pawel, I've uploaded a version 04 of the doc with the practices organized into observed and potential subsections. We didn't want multiple listings of best current practices in both sections 5 and 6. Hopefully this version is clear enough. Thanks! Bill On 6/19/24, 6:37 AM, "kowa...@denic.de

[regext] Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-newton-regext-rdap-considerations-on-rfc9537-00.txt

2024-06-21 Thread Jody Kolker
Hi Everyone, Just adding my 2 cents. When we were discussing how to redact information, we definitely discussed using place holder text and it was almost immediately rejected due to the fact that placeholder text in the phone field would cause the automated parsing performed by JSON libraries