[regext] REGEXT Agenda IETF 119 Brisbane

2024-03-04 Thread Antoin Verschuren
Hi all, I just uploaded our preliminary agenda for IETF 119 to the datatracker: https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/119/materials/agenda-119-regext-00 Please verify that I didn’t forget or misinterpreted any requests and let the chairs know if you still want a slot on our agenda. Though our ag

Re: [regext] [Ext] Re: RDAP and link context

2024-03-04 Thread Hollenbeck, Scott
From: regext On Behalf Of Jasdip Singh Sent: Sunday, March 3, 2024 2:12 PM To: James Mitchell ; Andrew Newton (andy) Cc: regext@ietf.org Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] [Ext] Re: RDAP and link context Caution: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click links or open at

Re: [regext] [Ext] Re: RDAP and link context

2024-03-04 Thread Jasdip Singh
Thanks, Scott. RFC 8288 (obsoletes RFC 5988) also retains this requirement (in section 2). Jasdip From: Hollenbeck, Scott Date: Monday, March 4, 2024 at 11:28 AM To: Jasdip Singh , james.mitch...@iana.org , a...@hxr.us Cc: regext@ietf.org Subject: RE: [regext] [Ext] Re: RDAP and link contex

Re: [regext] [Ext] Re: RDAP and link context

2024-03-04 Thread James Mitchell
Thanks for the link, Scott. It appears that the context was made mandatory because of an interpretation of “according to Section 3 of RFC5988, the members "value", "rel" and "href" are all required.” This is correct by definition, however fails to consider web linking as a whole. RFC 8288 defi

Re: [regext] [Ext] Re: RDAP and link context

2024-03-04 Thread Hollenbeck, Scott
Note that 9083 can’t be “fixed”. It’s a Standard RFC, not an Internet-Draft. Errata can be submitted, but that only applies if there’s an editorial or technical error. This sounds more like a desire for clarification, or text that describes how to interpret the requirement in an RDAP context. We

Re: [regext] [Ext] Re: Adding the DNS root to the bootstrap file

2024-03-04 Thread Andrew Newton (andy)
On Fri, Mar 1, 2024 at 6:36 PM James Mitchell wrote: > > I’d say the matching logic is arguably incorrect – matching should begin with > the parent of the supplied domain name. However, I acknowledge this arguably > affects only queries for TLDs themselves, as a TLD’s RDAP server could > redire

Re: [regext] [Ext] Re: RDAP and link context

2024-03-04 Thread Andrew Newton (andy)
On Fri, Mar 1, 2024 at 6:57 PM James Mitchell wrote: > > > The new gTLD Response profile > (https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/rdap-response-profile-21feb24-en.pdf) > says … “a value with the RDAP lookup path that generated the RDAP > response.”, requirements 2.6.3 and 2.10. Unless you

[regext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-regext-rdap-geofeed-02.txt

2024-03-04 Thread internet-drafts
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-regext-rdap-geofeed-02.txt is now available. It is a work item of the Registration Protocols Extensions (REGEXT) WG of the IETF. Title: An RDAP Extension for Geofeed Data Authors: Jasdip Singh Tom Harrison Name:draft-ietf-regext-rdap-geofeed-02.