Re: [regext] JSON Schema for RDAP RFC-9083

On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 6:55 AM Pawel Kowalik wrote: > > 4. Schema languages give a false sense of conformance. Conformance > tools are far more important. > > Schema won't replace the conformance tools for sure, as not every constraint > or relation can be covered with schema. But it makes it a

[regext] Call for agenda items IETF 118

Hi All, Ii’s time to think about agenda items for IETF 118. Jim and I requested a one and half hour time slot this time, same as IETF 117. So if you intend to request for a presentation, please let the chairs know. Regards, Jim and Antoin ___ regext

Re: [regext] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-newton-regext-rdap-simple-contact-01.txt

Hi Pawel, This is a very interesting idea. Even in non-EPP registries, it is unlikely that more than one representation of a name, etc.. will be collected. Therefore, this reduction makes sense to me. I disagree with wrapping name and role in the postal information as those elements are used for n

Re: [regext] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-newton-regext-rdap-simple-contact-01.txt

On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 6:46 AM Mario Loffredo wrote: > > [ML] Why doesn't the postal address include a property representing the city > ? The country code and the city are required information in RFC5733 while the > postal code is optional. This is a good point. It was dropped in an exercise o

Re: [regext] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-newton-regext-rdap-simple-contact-01.txt

Hi Andy, Am 25.09.23 um 16:04 schrieb Andrew Newton: I disagree with wrapping name and role in the postal information as those elements are used for non postal reasons and there are definitely non-EPP registries that do not model this the same way. [PK] Makes sense to me to be able to have

Re: [regext] Paul Wouters' Discuss on draft-ietf-regext-rdap-redacted-14: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Paul, Thank you for the review and feedback. I provide a response to your feedback embedded below. Thanks, -- JG James Gould Fellow Engineer jgo...@verisign.com 703-948-3271 12061 Bluemont Way Reston, VA 20190 Verisign.com On 9/21/23, 9:09 AM, "Paul W

Re: [regext] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-regext-rdap-reverse-search-25: (with COMMENT)

Hi Mario! Thanks for the response. Response inline … From: Mario Loffredo Sent: Friday, September 1, 2023 6:50 AM To: Roman Danyliw ; The IESG Cc: draft-ietf-regext-rdap-reverse-sea...@ietf.org; regext-cha...@ietf.org; regext@ietf.org; t...@apnic.net Subject: Re: Roman Danyliw's No Objection

Re: [regext] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-regext-rdap-reverse-search-25: (with COMMENT)

Hi Roman, again my reponses below. Il 25/09/2023 22:55, Roman Danyliw ha scritto: Hi Mario! Thanks for the response.  Response inline … *From:* Mario Loffredo *Sent:* Friday, September 1, 2023 6:50 AM *To:* Roman Danyliw ; The IESG *Cc:* draft-ietf-regext-rdap-reverse-sea...@ietf.org; reg