[regext] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-regext-rdap-openid-25: (with COMMENT)

2023-09-14 Thread Éric Vyncke via Datatracker
Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-regext-rdap-openid-25: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to

Re: [regext] [Ext] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-regext-epp-ttl-02.txt

2023-09-14 Thread Brian Dickson
On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 6:34 AM Marc Groeneweg wrote: > Hi Gavin, > > > > I am going to review your draft. I see you’re using a ttl object for > adding, updating and removing ttls on a role type. Is it also an idea to > extend existing objects (domain and host) with a ttl field? I know this is >

Re: [regext] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-regext-rdap-openid-25: (with COMMENT)

2023-09-14 Thread Hollenbeck, Scott
> -Original Message- > From: Éric Vyncke via Datatracker > Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2023 8:50 AM > To: The IESG > Cc: draft-ietf-regext-rdap-ope...@ietf.org; regext-cha...@ietf.org; > regext@ietf.org; AlBanna, Zaid ; AlBanna, Zaid > > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Éric Vyncke's No Objection o

Re: [regext] [Ext] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-regext-epp-ttl-02.txt

2023-09-14 Thread Marc Groeneweg
Hi Brian, And you’re quite right, and I stand corrected. So, the TTLs must be defined at the RRset level, so I am going to think again on a possible solution, ‘cause I have the same feeling as Gavin the proposed way is not a very elegant way. But again, it might be the most pragmatic solution