Re: [regext] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-regext-rdap-reverse-search-24

2023-08-24 Thread Tim Chown
Hi, On 22 Aug 2023, at 10:50, Mario Loffredo wrote: Hi Tim, thanks a lot for your review. Please find my comments inline I’ll answer the privacy point in response to Andy’s email. Il 21/08/2023 20:27, Tim Chown via Datatracker ha scritto: Reviewer: Tim Chown Review result: Not Ready It

Re: [regext] [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-regext-rdap-reverse-search-24

2023-08-24 Thread Tim Chown
Hi Andy, On 22 Aug 2023, at 16:41, Andrew Newton wrote: [You don't often get email from a...@hxr.us. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ] On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 4:54 AM Mario Loffredo wrote: [ML] Firstly, would say at the outset that the authors and

Re: [regext] Roman Danyliw's Discuss on draft-ietf-regext-rdap-reverse-search-24: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2023-08-24 Thread Mario Loffredo
Hi Roman, thanks a lot for your review. Please find my comments inline. Il 22/08/2023 21:20, Roman Danyliw via Datatracker ha scritto: Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-regext-rdap-reverse-search-24: Discuss When responding, please keep the subject line in

Re: [regext] John Scudder's Discuss on draft-ietf-regext-rdap-reverse-search-24: (with DISCUSS)

2023-08-24 Thread Mario Loffredo
Hi John, thanks a lot for your review. Please find my comments below. Il 22/08/2023 22:55, John Scudder via Datatracker ha scritto: John Scudder has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-regext-rdap-reverse-search-24: Discuss When responding, please keep the subject line intact

Re: [regext] Robert Wilton's Discuss on draft-ietf-regext-rdap-reverse-search-24: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2023-08-24 Thread Mario Loffredo
Hi Robert, thanks a lot for your review. Please find my comments inline. Il 23/08/2023 15:06, Robert Wilton via Datatracker ha scritto: Robert Wilton has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-regext-rdap-reverse-search-24: Discuss When responding, please keep the subject line i

Re: [regext] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-regext-rdap-reverse-search-24: (with COMMENT)

2023-08-24 Thread Mario Loffredo
Hi Éric, thanks a lot for your review. Best, Mario Il 23/08/2023 16:15, Éric Vyncke via Datatracker ha scritto: Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-regext-rdap-reverse-search-24: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to a

Re: [regext] Lars Eggert's Discuss on draft-ietf-regext-rdap-reverse-search-24: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2023-08-24 Thread Murray S. Kucherawy
On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 6:11 AM Mario Loffredo wrote: > > ### Outdated references > > > > Document references `draft-ietf-jsonpath-base-17`, but `-19` is the > latest > > available revision. > > [ML] The document makes use of the citation > > https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml3/reference.I-D.

Re: [regext] John Scudder's Discuss on draft-ietf-regext-rdap-reverse-search-24: (with DISCUSS)

2023-08-24 Thread Murray S. Kucherawy
On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 3:33 AM Mario Loffredo wrote: > > It looks as though draft-ietf-jsonpath-base should be a Normative > reference. In > > fact, this is explicitly mentioned in the shepherd writeup (thank you!): > > > > > 15. Should any informative references be normative or > vice-

Re: [regext] [Ext] Robert Wilton's Discuss on draft-ietf-regext-rdap-reverse-search-24: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2023-08-24 Thread Mario Loffredo
Hi Amanda, Il 23/08/2023 19:51, Amanda Baber ha scritto: Regarding the use of a brief description in the registry itself as the "Specification" in "Specification Required": I missed it this time, but we ran into this same question with draft-ietf-calext-jscalendar-21, and FWIW, Barry Leiba re

Re: [regext] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-regext-rdap-reverse-search-24

2023-08-24 Thread Mario Loffredo
Hi Tim, again my responses below. Il 24/08/2023 10:02, Tim Chown ha scritto: Hi, On 22 Aug 2023, at 10:50, Mario Loffredo wrote: Hi Tim, thanks a lot for your review. Please find my comments inline I’ll answer the privacy point in response to Andy’s email. Il 21/08/2023 20:27, Tim Ch

Re: [regext] [Ext] Robert Wilton's Discuss on draft-ietf-regext-rdap-reverse-search-24: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2023-08-24 Thread Amanda Baber
Hi Mario, I see that the new text is "References are not limited only to RFCs but can also locate document published outside of the RFC path, including informal documentation." For IANA's purposes, this sentence isn't necessary, as the Specification Required policy was specifically meant to enc

Re: [regext] [Ext] Robert Wilton's Discuss on draft-ietf-regext-rdap-reverse-search-24: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2023-08-24 Thread Mario Loffredo
Hi Amanda, thanks a lot for your quick reply. You're right. I can remove that sentence. Thanks a lot, Mario Il 25/08/2023 00:17, Amanda Baber ha scritto: Hi Mario, I see that the new text is "References are not limited only to RFCs but can also locate document published outside of the RFC