HI Scott,
Il 15/08/2023 16:23, Hollenbeck, Scott ha scritto:
Our AD’s review of draft-ietf-regext-rdap-openid-23 noted that all of
the members of the farv1_session" data structure are OPTIONAL. As
such, a completely empty data structure is syntactically valid, but is
it realistic? Does it m
From: Mario Loffredo
Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2023 7:18 AM
To: Hollenbeck, Scott ; regext@ietf.org
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] "farv1_session" Data Structure: All Members
OPTIONAL?
Caution: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click
links or open attachments un
From: Murray S. Kucherawy
Sent: Monday, August 14, 2023 6:23 PM
To: Hollenbeck, Scott
Cc: regext@ietf.org; AlBanna, Zaid ;
regext-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] Publication has been requested for
draft-ietf-regext-rdap-openid-23
Caution: This email originated from outside
On Sat, Aug 12, 2023 at 7:38 PM Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
>
> Thanks, Andy, for a good shepherd writeup. It would be helpful, even if it
> seems redundant or obvious, to include an answer to the question about why
> Proposed Standard is the right status for this document.
The write-up has bee
Thanks Mario. I understand the intent and had assumed that multiple
mappings were allowed.
While Scott and I understand, do we feel that future DE's might need
better guidance? Is the term "collisions" clear enough for a future DE
that may not have the benefit of having read this email thread?
-a
