[regext] RFC 5731 and Domain Object Deletion

2023-05-10 Thread Hollenbeck, Scott
RFC 5731 contains text that has led some domain name registrars to adopt an operational practice of re-naming name server host objects so that they can delete domain objects. The text in question can be found in Section 3.2.2, "EPP Command": "A domain object SHOULD NOT be deleted if subordina

Re: [regext] RFC 5731 and Domain Object Deletion

2023-05-10 Thread Gould, James
Scott, I see value with addressing this. I would broaden the scope to also include RFC 5732 language: A host name object SHOULD NOT be deleted if the host object is associated with any other object. For example, if the host object is associated with a domain object, the host object SHOULD

Re: [regext] RFC 5731 and Domain Object Deletion

2023-05-10 Thread Andrew Newton
On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 12:57 PM Hollenbeck, Scott wrote: > > So, questions for the working group: > > Is this a topic we should address? Yes! > > If we want to address it, how? New I-D as I suggested above? 5731 erratum? > Re-open 5731 and add text (this one is definitely NOT my preference)?

Re: [regext] RFC 5731 and Domain Object Deletion

2023-05-10 Thread Patrick Mevzek
On Wed, May 10, 2023, at 11:57, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote: > RFC 5731 contains text that has led some domain name registrars to > adopt an operational practice of re-naming name server host objects so > that they can delete domain objects. There aren't any other real working methods unfortunatel