> Just gave an initial read. I’m not quite sure of the use-case that would
> motivate this, other than trying to eliminate round-trips. But maybe that’s
> the point. :-)
Yes, that's the point. It's not atypical for a registrar to have to perform 6
or more commands in order to retrieve all t
Hi Jim,
> Upon my first review, I find the extension to be an interesting aggregation
> concept. I’m not exactly sure why the client wouldn’t just make separate
> calls to get the same information.
Yes, it can, but I believe there is some efficiency that can be achieved in
terms of roundtrip
