Re: [regext] Analysis of tight coupling between extension identifier and rdapConformance, versus lack of

2022-05-20 Thread Mario Loffredo
Hi Jasdip, thanks a lot for this job. Let me share some thoughts. Think that one of the reasons why RDAP (and modern REST APIs in general) returns a JSON response is that JSON is schemaless so it implicitly reduces the risk of introducing breaking changes in responses by design. Given that

Re: [regext] Extension Prefixes, JSON Values, and URI Path Segments

2022-05-20 Thread Hollenbeck, Scott
> -Original Message- > From: Tom Harrison > Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2022 8:44 PM > To: Gould, James > Cc: Hollenbeck, Scott ; regext@ietf.org > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Re: Re: Re: [regext] Extension Prefixes, JSON > Values, and URI Path Segments [SAH] snip > > Agreed, the uniqueness is

Re: [regext] AD Review: draft-ietf-regext-epp-eai

2022-05-20 Thread Dmitry Belyavsky
Dear Murray, Thank you for your review! On Tue, May 17, 2022 at 7:28 PM Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: > Hi all, thanks for sending this along. And thanks for including Section 7. > > 1) In Section 3, you have: > > "The validation rules introduced in RFC 6531 are considered to be > followed." > >

Re: [regext] Extension Prefixes, JSON Values, and URI Path Segments

2022-05-20 Thread Andrew Newton
On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 8:44 PM Tom Harrison wrote: > > RFC 7483 was pretty clear about this: > > When custom JSON values are inserted into responses, conformance > to those custom specifications MUST use a string prefixed with the > appropriate identifier from the IANA RDAP Extensions