Re: [regext] Comments to the feedback about epp-over-http

2022-03-29 Thread Mario Loffredo
Hi Matthias, thanks a lot for your interest and feedback. Please find my comments inline prefixed with [ML] Il 28/03/2022 23:40, Matthias Pfeifer ha scritto: Hello, i would also add a comment and questions: >In the perspective of moving to the cloud to achieve scalability and >  cost reducti

Re: [regext] Comments to the feedback about epp-over-http

2022-03-29 Thread Gould, James
Mario, My feedback is embedded below. -- JG [cid:image001.png@01D84340.6739D180] James Gould Fellow Engineer jgo...@verisign.com 703-948-3271 12061 Bluemont Way Reston, VA 20190 Verisign.com From: Mario Loffredo Date: Monday, March 28, 2022 at 6:59 AM To: James Gou

Re: [regext] Comments to the feedback about epp-over-http

2022-03-29 Thread Thomas Corte (TANGO support)
Hello, On 3/25/22 15:58, Mario Loffredo wrote: Hi folks, here are in the following some comments grouped by subject to last meeting's feedback about EPP-over-HTTP: ... *2)  Cookies* Jim (Reed) asked why cookies should be used in this case. ... Which method other than session cookie shoud be

Re: [regext] Comments to the feedback about epp-over-http

2022-03-29 Thread Mario Loffredo
Hi James, Il 29/03/2022 13:41, Gould, James ha scritto: Mario, My feedback is embedded below. -- JG *James Gould *Fellow Engineer jgo...@verisign.com 703-948-3271 12061 Bluemont Way Reston, VA 20190 Verisign.com *From: *Mario Loffredo *Date: *Monday, Marc

Re: [regext] Comments to the feedback about epp-over-http

2022-03-29 Thread Mario Loffredo
Hi Thomas, Il 29/03/2022 14:05, Thomas Corte (TANGO support) ha scritto: Hello, On 3/25/22 15:58, Mario Loffredo wrote: Hi folks, here are in the following some comments grouped by subject to last meeting's feedback about EPP-over-HTTP: ... *2)  Cookies* Jim (Reed) asked why cookies shoul

Re: [regext] Comments to the feedback about epp-over-http

2022-03-29 Thread Thomas Corte (TANGO support)
Hello Mario, On 3/29/22 17:07, Mario Loffredo wrote: That's exactly my main concern about such an idea that was the same supporting last proposal about EPP-over-HTTP submitted to this WG. Making EPP completely stateful appeared,and still apeears, to me inefficient and in contrast with the tr

Re: [regext] Comments to the feedback about epp-over-http

2022-03-29 Thread Gould, James
Mario, My responses are embedded below. -- JG [cid:image001.png@01D84363.253C6D10] James Gould Fellow Engineer jgo...@verisign.com 703-948-3271 12061 Bluemont Way Reston, VA 20190 Verisign.com From: Mario Loffredo Date: Tuesday, March 29, 2022 at 11:00 AM To: James

[regext] Fwd: Comments to the feedback about epp-over-http

2022-03-29 Thread Matthias Pfeifer
Hello Mario, That said, AFAIK most of cloud providers don't allow to open low level sockets. You cannot use any >port except 80 and 443 (HTTP and HTTPS).  I imagine that they do that due to security reasons. I am assuming that you are talking about services the cloud provider offers (btw, a

[regext] Fwd: Comments to the feedback about epp-over-http

2022-03-29 Thread Mario Loffredo
Hi Matthias, Il 29/03/2022 18:54, Matthias Pfeifer ha scritto: Hello Marion, >That said, AFAIK most of cloud providers don't allow to open low level sockets. You cannot use any >port except 80 and 443 (HTTP and HTTPS).  I imagine that they do that due to security reasons. I am assuming that