Re: [regext] RDAP preference on abuse reporting

2022-02-16 Thread Mario Loffredo
Hi Alessandro, plase see my comments below prefixed with [ML] Il 15/02/2022 19:23, Hollenbeck, Scott ha scritto: -Original Message- From: Alessandro Vesely Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2022 1:08 PM To: Hollenbeck, Scott;regext@ietf.org Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] RDAP preference on

[regext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-regext-simple-registration-reporting-05.txt

2022-02-16 Thread internet-drafts
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Registration Protocols Extensions WG of the IETF. Title : Simple Registration Reporting Authors : Joseph Yee James Galvin

[regext] Feedback about rdap-redacted doc

2022-02-16 Thread Mario Loffredo
Hi James, I have experienced the use case where multiple contacts have the same role but not all of them are redacted. Hence, a JSONPath where redacted contacts are identified by filtering the enties only by role is not good. Possible alternatives are: - appending an index selector to inde

Re: [regext] Feedback about rdap-redacted doc

2022-02-16 Thread Gould, James
Mario, I believe that your second option is the simpler one. I agree that we should add an entry in section 5 "JSONPath Considerations" to address it. How about the following entry? When there are multiple entities with the same role, include "redacted" members for each entity using the enti