On Sat, Dec 18, 2021 at 2:53 PM Taras Heichenko
wrote:
>
>
> > On 15 Dec 2021, at 16:14, Dmitry Belyavsky wrote:
> >
> > Dear Taras.
>
> Dear Dmitry
>
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 8:13 PM Taras Heichenko
> wrote:
> > The comment is in body.
> >
> > > On 13 Dec 2021, at 15:15, Hollenbeck, Sco
Hello all,
I agree with Tim's point. Support +1
RFC8499 provides the DNS terminology, which provides a list of DNS protocol
related terminology.
This document can provide a neutral DNS Data Dictionary related to Domain
name registered data. I think that it will be useful for registry, regi
I think this work is worth pursuing. But with a couple of caveats.
1) it's hard to change the wider community around "normative language"
and so we have to set realistic goals for actually moving the marker
in the wider community to what words people use. That doesn't mean it
isn't worth being cle
George,
Thanks for your thoughtful comments. I look forward to responses from others.
I’m certainly open to changes that improve clarity and/or usability.
Steve
Sent from my iPhone
> On Dec 19, 2021, at 9:42 PM, George Michaelson wrote:
>
> I think this work is worth pursuing. But with a
On Sun, Dec 19, 2021, at 21:23, Jiankang Yao wrote:
> How about renaming "DNS Data Dictionary" to "DNS Registration Data
> Dictionary" or seome else?
You could even drop "DNS" from "DNS Registration Data Dictionary".
First because even today by domain name registrars and registries, EPP/RD
