Dear Working Group,
The authors of the following working group document have indicated that it is
believed to be ready for submission to the IESG for publication as a standards
track document:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-epp-eai/
This WG last call will end at close of bu
A few questions/comments:
Section 6: We need to provide the rationale for that SHOULD (Registries SHOULD
validate the domain names in the provided email addresses). What does
"validate" mean? For syntax? For reachability?
Section 7: What's significant about "eai-0.3"? The "0.3" part doesn't tra
Hi all,
In addition to the questions from Mario, we still need to discuss the status of
this document as discussed during the IETF112 meeting:
"the document doesn’t have designated status; it was adopted without a status
(on purpose). We need to think about the implications. Encouraged group to
> Le 6 déc. 2021 à 09:29, Antoin Verschuren a
> écrit :
>
> Hi all,
>
> In addition to the questions from Mario, we still need to discuss the status
> of this document as discussed during the IETF112 meeting:
>
> "the document doesn’t have designated status; it was adopted without a status
Changed milestone "Submit for publication "Federated Authentication for the
Registration Data Access Protocol (RDAP) using OpenID Connect"", added
draft-ietf-regext-rdap-openid to milestone.
URL: https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/regext/about/
___
regext
Changed milestone "Submit for publication "Registration Data Access Protocol
(RDAP) Reverse search capabilities"", added
draft-ietf-regext-rdap-reverse-search to milestone.
URL: https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/regext/about/
___
regext mailing list
regex
