Re: [regext] pass on the lower fee

2021-08-18 Thread Martin Casanova
Thanks a lot Mario, Thomas and James for your helpful feedback and example that point me all to the same solution! One more question: We would only be using a snippet of the fee extension and its namespace in this poll message but not fully implement it. Therefore should we include it in t

Re: [regext] pass on the lower fee

2021-08-18 Thread Gould, James
Martin, If you do return the extension in a poll response it should be included in the greeting services. My recommendation is to fully implement the registry fee extension along with this so not to cause client confusion. -- JG James Gould Fellow Engineer jgo...@verisign.com 703-948-

Re: [regext] pass on the lower fee

2021-08-18 Thread Thomas Corte (TANGO support)
Hello, On 8/18/21 14:57, Gould, James wrote: > Martin, > > If you do return the extension in a poll response it should be included in > the greeting services. My recommendation is to fully implement the registry > fee extension along with this so not to cause client confusion. Agreed, adding

Re: [regext] pass on the lower fee

2021-08-18 Thread InterNetX - Marco Schrieck
Hi Martin, I can speak only from my side. we parse the greating and activate from the response different modules in our software. If the namespace is not included, we have to manually add it somewhere. Regards Marco Am 18.08.21 um 14:51 schrieb Martin Casanova: > > Thanks a lot Mario, Thoma