Jothan,
Your message is confusing.
The subject of the message suggests you’re supporting rfc7484bis, but
the content of the message is all about registry-maintenance.
Would you please clarify your support?
Thanks,
Jim
On 15 Apr 2021, at 12:50, Jothan Frakes wrote:
+1draft-ietf-rege
We are extending this LAST CALL until 10 May 2021.
As this document is advancing to Internet Standard from Proposed
Standard, we require substantial support from the working group before
supporting it for publication.
We have 3 indications of support: Mario Loffredo, Scott Hollenbeck, and
Ja
Dear regext. I've read and reviewed the document and fully
support it. Much needed and long awaited.
Regards,
Hugo Salgado
NIC Chile - .CL
On 09:31 03/05, James Galvin wrote:
> We are extending this LAST CALL until 10 May 2021.
>
> As this document is advancing to Internet Standard from Propose
Hi all,
This is a preliminary call for agenda items for the virtual IETF 111 meeting.
Jim and I plan to request for a 1 hour slot since we only have 4 active
documents on our milestone list for now, and the IESG have asked us to be
conservative in our time consumption this time.
Since we also re
I support.
Thanks
Rick
On 5/3/21, 9:31 AM, "regext on behalf of James Galvin"
wrote:
Caution: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click
links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content
is safe.
We are extending this LAST CALL
Changed milestone "Submit for publication "Using JSContact in Registration
Data Access Protocol (RDAP) JSON Responses"", set state to active from
review, accepting new milestone.
Changed milestone "Submit for publication "Use of Internationalized Email
Addresses in EPP protocol"", set state to act
Hi Jim-
I support both but the focus on my email was to provide a +1 support for
registry-maintenance
-Jothan
On Mon, May 3, 2021 at 5:59 AM James Galvin wrote:
> Jothan,
>
> Your message is confusing.
>
> The subject of the message suggests you’re supporting rfc7484bis, but the
> content of
