Re: [regext] WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-epp-registry-maintenance-09

+1 -Original Message- From: regext On Behalf Of Tobias Sattler Sent: Thursday, January 7, 2021 1:57 AM To: Antoin Verschuren Cc: regext Subject: Re: [regext] WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-epp-registry-maintenance-09 Notice: This email is from an external sender. +1 > On 4. Jan 2

Re: [regext] EXTENDED 2nd WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-rfc7482bis

Feedback I’ve seen thus far: Expressions of support: 8 (Jody, Gustavo, Tom, Maurizio, Mario, Roger, Jasdip, Scott) Expressions of concern: 0 I noticed that James Gould expressed support for 7483bis, but not 7482bis. Jim, any issues? Scott From: regext On Behalf Of Antoin Verschuren

Re: [regext] EXTENDED 2nd WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-rfc7483bis

Feedback I’ve seen thus far: Expressions of support: 8 (Gustavo, Tom, James Gould, Maurizio, Mario, Roger, Jasdip, Scott) Expressions of concern: 0 I noticed that Jody expressed support for 7482bis, but not 7483bis. Jody, any issues? Scott From: regext On Behalf Of Antoin Verschuren

Re: [regext] EXTENDED 2nd WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-rfc7482bis

Scott, No issues, add me under the support column. -- JG [cid:image001.png@01D6E4CC.9C6786A0] James Gould Fellow Engineer jgo...@verisign.com 703-948-3271 12061 Bluemont Way Reston, VA 20190 Verisign.com From: regext on behalf of "Hollenbeck, Scott" Date: Thursda

Re: [regext] WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-epp-registry-maintenance-09

Antoin, I was surprised to see draft-ietf-regext-epp-registry-maintenance move to WGLC based on the work that has been progressing on the mailing list, so at this point I can’t support publication of the document. The document editors have addressed my prior feedback. Upon a fresh review, b