Hi All,
It wa interesting to see the interest during REGEXT IETF 109 meeting call
to address the the privacy aspects of draft
(draft-ietf-regext-rdap-reverse-search).
So far my idea to improve the reverse search to first make the JSON object
for the required level of privacy critical data. Base
Thank you, Jim.
@Martin: have you been able to confirm the same? Sorry if I missed that you
have done so.
From: James Gould
Date: Tuesday, November 24, 2020 at 12:51 PM
To: "Smith, David - Dulles" , "martin.casan...@switch.ch"
, "regext@ietf.org"
Subject: Re: draft-ietf-regext-unhandled-names
Hi –
As the document shepherd for draft-ietf-regext-unhandled-namespaces, I reviewed
the text of the draft and had the following feedback for consideration. It’s
grouped by document section or page number.
Abstract
"server tof determine" -> "tof" typo
2. Unhandled Namespaces
Original:
"The un
The IESG has approved the following document:
- 'Registration Data Access Protocol (RDAP) Query Parameters for Result
Sorting and Paging'
(draft-ietf-regext-rdap-sorting-and-paging-20.txt) as Proposed Standard
This document is the product of the Registration Protocols Extensions Working
Group
