On 19.11.20 19:14, Gould, James wrote:
Klaus,
The EAI support goes beyond RFC 5733 and is a perfect example of the use of the
extensibility built into EPP. Revising the RFCs and EPP extensions that use
email addresses for EAI with new XML namespaces and potentially other changes
is much more
> -Original Message-
> From: regext On Behalf Of Klaus Malorny
> Sent: Friday, November 20, 2020 3:47 AM
> To: regext@ietf.org
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] Internationalized Email Addresses and EPP
>
> Caution: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click
> link
> On 20 Nov 2020, at 07:04, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote:
>
[skip]
>> Let's compare the pros and contras of both
>> (1)
>> + allows implementation by minimum changes in the software. It is enough
>> to change the rule which checks email addresses.
>
> I disagree with this completely. A new versi
> On 20 Nov 2020, at 11:06, Hollenbeck, Scott
> wrote:
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: regext On Behalf Of Klaus Malorny
>> Sent: Friday, November 20, 2020 3:47 AM
>> To: regext@ietf.org
>> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] Internationalized Email Addresses and EPP
>>
>> Caution: Th
> -Original Message-
> From: Taras Heichenko
> Sent: Friday, November 20, 2020 6:13 AM
> To: Hollenbeck, Scott
> Cc: klaus.malo...@knipp.de; regext@ietf.org
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] Internationalized Email Addresses and EPP
>
> Caution: This email originated from outside the org
> -Original Message-
> From: Taras Heichenko
> Sent: Friday, November 20, 2020 5:49 AM
> To: Hollenbeck, Scott
> Cc: regext@ietf.org
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] EAI in EPP from a registrar point of view
>
> Caution: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click
On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 2:17 PM Hollenbeck, Scott wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Taras Heichenko
> > Sent: Friday, November 20, 2020 6:13 AM
> > To: Hollenbeck, Scott
> > Cc: klaus.malo...@knipp.de; regext@ietf.org
> > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] Internationalized Email Ad
> On 20 Nov 2020, at 13:18, Hollenbeck, Scott
> wrote:
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Taras Heichenko
>> Sent: Friday, November 20, 2020 5:49 AM
>> To: Hollenbeck, Scott
>> Cc: regext@ietf.org
>> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] EAI in EPP from a registrar point of view
>>
>> Cau
Hi all,
I prefer option 2.
Similarly to option 3, it doesn't involve a change to EPP core but it is
less complex to be implemented for both registrars and registries.
After all, the placeholder value "[EAI-ADDRESS]" is itself uncompliant
with the current contact:email definition.
Best,
M
On 20.11.20 14:37, Taras Heichenko wrote:
Right - it's a lot MORE work.
Let's ask Klaus what takes more developer's work, changing namespace, or adding
the extension generation and parsing.
(In the neighbor thread Klaus wrote that his company is developing EPP
software.)
Hi,
well, for t
> On 20 Nov 2020, at 19:32, Klaus Malorny wrote:
>
> On 20.11.20 14:37, Taras Heichenko wrote:
>>> Right - it's a lot MORE work.
>> Let's ask Klaus what takes more developer's work, changing namespace, or
>> adding the extension generation and parsing.
>> (In the neighbor thread Klaus wrote t
11 matches
Mail list logo
