The REGEXT WG has placed draft-loffredo-regext-rdap-jcard-deprecation in state
Candidate for WG Adoption (entered by James Galvin)
The document is available at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-loffredo-regext-rdap-jcard-deprecation/
___
regext
On Tue, Oct 27, 2020, at 10:55, Thomas Corte wrote:
> If a registry really wants registrars to understand and process their
> custom poll messages, it can still resort to simply reject the
> command if it doesn't contain the namespace in question.
That would certainly have my preference and it ha
Patrick,
Do you mean it's better to fail the login if the client doesn't support all of
the possible EPP extensions supported by the poll queue? I view that option as
being highly impactful to the clients and it would morph a certain set of
services as required by the client at login, which do
On Mon, Nov 2, 2020, at 10:42, Gould, James wrote:
> Do you mean it's better to fail the login if the client doesn't support
> all of the possible EPP extensions supported by the poll queue?
Between this and the specification as currently presented, I prefer the login
failure,
yes.
No option
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Registration Protocols Extensions WG of the
IETF.
Title : Simple Registration Reporting
Authors : Joseph Yee
James Galvin
