Re: [regext] RFC 8748, EPP Registry Fee Extension: availability check result depending on fee extension?

2020-07-10 Thread Thomas Corte (TANGO support)
Hello, On 6/26/20 16:18, Gould, James wrote: > The goal is to cover the case of a client not passing the fee extension at > all, with the assumption that the fee extension would reference the create > command. It's simpler to make the case based on the existence or > non-existence of the fee

[regext] Document and Milestone Discussion at IETF108

2020-07-10 Thread James Galvin
Listed below are 8 working group documents currently on our task list. Only one has a presentation slot for IETF108 as technical work has progressed and will be discussed. In all cases, the co-Chairs will take the time to open a discussion of the status of each document. As everyone knows, w

[regext] Document Status: draft-ietf-regext-rfc7483bis

2020-07-10 Thread Hollenbeck, Scott
* What work needs to be done before this can be submitted for publication? I'm not aware of any open issues. It may be ready to be submitted now. * Are there implementations or plans for implementations? Yes, they are described in the document. * Who will be your document shepherd? If you have

[regext] Document Status: draft-ietf-regext-rfc7482bis

2020-07-10 Thread Hollenbeck, Scott
* What work needs to be done before this can be submitted for publication? I'm not aware of any open issues. It may be ready to be submitted now. * Are there implementations or plans for implementations? Yes, they are described in the document. * Who will be your document shepherd? If you have

[regext] Document Status: draft-ietf-regext-rdap-openid

2020-07-10 Thread Hollenbeck, Scott
* What work needs to be done before this can be submitted for publication? I've been waiting for outputs from ICANN's EPDP process to confirm that I have the right set of claims described in Section 3.1.4. We can either adjust the currently described set, declare victory and go with them, or con