Re: [regext] FW: I-D Action: draft-hollenbeck-regext-rfc7483bis-00.txt - Further feedback

Hi Scott, Il 06/05/2020 21:49, Hollenbeck, Scott ha scritto: *From:* Mario Loffredo *Sent:* Tuesday, February 25, 2020 9:02 AM *To:* Hollenbeck, Scott ; regext@ietf.org *Subject:* [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] FW: I-D Action: draft-hollenbeck-regext-rfc7483bis-00.txt - Further feedback Hi Scott,

Re: [regext] FW: I-D Action: draft-hollenbeck-regext-rfc7483bis-00.txt

Hi Scott, please find my comments below. Il 06/05/2020 20:50, Hollenbeck, Scott ha scritto: Thanks, Mario! More below. From: Mario Loffredo Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2020 4:17 AM To: Hollenbeck, Scott ; regext@ietf.org Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] FW: I-D Action: draft-hollenbec

Re: [regext] FW: I-D Action: draft-hollenbeck-regext-rfc7483bis-00.txt - Further feedback

From: Mario Loffredo Sent: Thursday, May 7, 2020 3:15 AM To: Hollenbeck, Scott ; regext@ietf.org Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] FW: I-D Action: draft-hollenbeck-regext-rfc7483bis-00.txt - Further feedback Hi Scott, Il 06/05/2020 21:49, Hollenbeck, Scott ha scritto: From: Mario Loffred

Re: [regext] FW: I-D Action: draft-hollenbeck-regext-rfc7483bis-00.txt

> -Original Message- > From: Mario Loffredo > Sent: Thursday, May 7, 2020 3:43 AM > To: Hollenbeck, Scott ; regext@ietf.org > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] FW: I-D Action: draft-hollenbeck-regext- > rfc7483bis-00.txt > > Hi Scott, > > please find my comments below. > > Il 06/05/2020

[regext] RDAP Event Members: REQUIRED or OPTIONAL?

Mario found an interesting issue in RFC 7483. The text in Section 4.5 says this: "The "events" array consists of objects, each with the following members: o "eventAction" -- a string denoting the reason for the event o "eventActor" -- an optional identifier denoting the actor responsible

Re: [regext] RDAP Event Members: REQUIRED or OPTIONAL?

Hi Scott, IMHO, the information required to represent an event are the event type and the event date. The one without the other is meaningless. The event actor has been already defined as optional on some basis. The "links" member is something that could be used to convey additional informatio

Re: [regext] RDAP Event Members: REQUIRED or OPTIONAL?

Good Morning, Thanks Scott, I do believe this suggestion would add clarity and is appropriate. Thanks Roger From: regext on behalf of Hollenbeck, Scott Sent: Thursday, May 7, 2020 8:34 AM To: regext@ietf.org Subject: [regext] RDAP Event Members: REQUIRED or

Re: [regext] RDAP Event Members: REQUIRED or OPTIONAL?

> -Original Message- > From: Mario Loffredo > Sent: Thursday, May 7, 2020 10:15 AM > To: Hollenbeck, Scott ; regext@ietf.org > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] RDAP Event Members: REQUIRED or > OPTIONAL? > > Hi Scott, > > IMHO, the information required to represent an event are the event t

Re: [regext] [Ext] Robert Wilton's Discuss on draft-ietf-regext-data-escrow-07: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Hi Gustavo, > -Original Message- > From: Gustavo Lozano > Sent: 17 April 2020 00:59 > To: Rob Wilton (rwilton) ; The IESG > Cc: draft-ietf-regext-data-esc...@ietf.org; regext-cha...@ietf.org; > regext@ietf.org; James Gould > Subject: Re: [Ext] Robert Wilton's Discuss on draft-ietf-rege

Re: [regext] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7483 (6158)

(Updating a few email addresses...) > -Original Message- > From: RFC Errata System > Sent: Wednesday, May 6, 2020 2:56 PM > To: a...@arin.net; Hollenbeck, Scott ; > superu...@gmail.com; barryle...@computer.org; o...@nlnetlabs.nl; > superu...@gmail.com > Cc: Hollenbeck, Scott ; wei...@ietf

Re: [regext] [Ext] Robert Wilton's Discuss on draft-ietf-regext-data-escrow-07: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

I'm afraid I have to agree with Gustavo that the terms used here need to match what's used in the domain this is written for. It's often the case that things mean different things in different domains, and sometimes those domains are similar enough that we wish it weren't the case. When it is, th

Re: [regext] [Ext] Robert Wilton's Discuss on draft-ietf-regext-data-escrow-07: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

> -Original Message- > From: regext On Behalf Of Barry Leiba > Sent: Thursday, May 7, 2020 1:37 PM > To: Rob Wilton (rwilton) > Cc: Gould, James ; regext-cha...@ietf.org; The IESG > ; Gustavo Lozano ; > regext@ietf.org; draft-ietf-regext-data-esc...@ietf.org > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [reg

Re: [regext] [Ext] Robert Wilton's Discuss on draft-ietf-regext-data-escrow-07: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

+1 Scott. From: regext on behalf of Hollenbeck, Scott Sent: Thursday, May 7, 2020 12:53 PM To: barryle...@computer.org ; rwilton=40cisco@dmarc.ietf.org Cc: Gould, James ; regext-cha...@ietf.org ; i...@ietf.org ; gustavo.loz...@icann.org ; regext@ietf.o

Re: [regext] [Ext] Robert Wilton's Discuss on draft-ietf-regext-data-escrow-07: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

+1 -- JG [cid:image001.png@01D255E2.EB933A30] James Gould Fellow Engineer jgo...@verisign.com 703-948-3271 12061 Bluemont Way Reston, VA 20190 Verisign.com From: Roger Carney Date: Thursday, May 7, 2020 at 2:42 PM To: "Hollenbeck, Scott" , "barryle...@computer.org"