Re: [regext] FW: I-D Action: draft-hollenbeck-regext-rfc7483bis-00.txt

Hello Scott, On Tue, Feb 18, 2020, at 07:31, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote: > Lastly, let's > start to talk about any other needed clarifications. Are you aware of > any? Send 'em to the list for discussion. First, please excuse me in advance if I didn't understood things right, as my points below a

Re: [regext] FW: I-D Action: draft-hollenbeck-regext-rfc7482bis-00.txt

On Thu, Jan 23, 2020, at 07:35, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote: > FYI, folks. I just submitted the first version of 7482bis. I've > addressed the known errata, but I also have some clarification > suggestions queued up for discussion. I'll start a thread for each of > those shortly. See my previou

Re: [regext] FW: I-D Action: draft-hollenbeck-regext-rfc7483bis-00.txt

> -Original Message- > From: regext On Behalf Of Patrick Mevzek > Sent: Monday, April 27, 2020 3:51 AM > To: regext@ietf.org > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] FW: I-D Action: draft-hollenbeck-regext- > rfc7483bis-00.txt > > Hello Scott, > > On Tue, Feb 18, 2020, at 07:31, Hollenbeck, Scot

Re: [regext] FW: I-D Action: draft-hollenbeck-regext-rfc7482bis-00.txt

> -Original Message- > From: regext On Behalf Of Patrick Mevzek > Sent: Monday, April 27, 2020 4:06 AM > To: regext@ietf.org > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] FW: I-D Action: draft-hollenbeck-regext- > rfc7482bis-00.txt > > > > On Thu, Jan 23, 2020, at 07:35, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote: > >

Re: [regext] Signaling BCP support in EPP for draft-ietf-regext-secure-authinfo-transfer and draft-ietf-regext-unhandled-namespaces

Patrick, Thank you for your review and feedback. I provide answers to your feedback below. -- JG James Gould Fellow Engineer jgo...@verisign.com 703-948-3271 12061 Bluemont Way Reston, VA 20190 Verisign.com On 4/27/20, 1:08 AM, "regext on behalf of Patrick

Re: [regext] WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-rdap-partial-response

Hi Patrick, your feedback is really welcomed. Better late than never. My responses to your comments are included below. Il 27/04/2020 07:45, Patrick Mevzek ha scritto: On Fri, Feb 28, 2020, at 09:43, Antoin Verschuren wrote: The following working group document is believed to be ready for su

Re: [regext] WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-rdap-partial-response

Hello Mario, A quick follow-up that could be a closure in fact, as your answer fills the missing points I had. On Mon, Apr 27, 2020, at 10:30, Mario Loffredo wrote: > Il 27/04/2020 07:45, Patrick Mevzek ha scritto: > > > > On Fri, Feb 28, 2020, at 09:43, Antoin Verschuren wrote: > >> The followin

Re: [regext] FW: I-D Action: draft-hollenbeck-regext-rfc7482bis-00.txt

On Mon, Apr 27, 2020, at 06:27, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: regext On Behalf Of Patrick Mevzek > > Sent: Monday, April 27, 2020 4:06 AM > > To: regext@ietf.org > > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] FW: I-D Action: draft-hollenbeck-regext- > > rfc7482bis-00.txt

Re: [regext] FW: I-D Action: draft-hollenbeck-regext-rfc7482bis-00.txt

> -Original Message- > From: regext On Behalf Of Patrick Mevzek > Sent: Monday, April 27, 2020 11:47 AM > To: regext@ietf.org > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] FW: I-D Action: draft-hollenbeck-regext- > rfc7482bis-00.txt > > On Mon, Apr 27, 2020, at 06:27, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote: > > > -

Re: [regext] WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-rdap-partial-response

Hi Patrick, Il 27/04/2020 08:04, Patrick Mevzek ha scritto: Also: couldn't each fieldset have a list of jsonPath elements (similar to what is done in draft-ietf-regext-rdap-sorting-and-paging) to properly list the fields concerned? I dropped this solution because it seemed to me conceptually v

Re: [regext] WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-rdap-partial-response

On Mon, Apr 27, 2020, at 11:46, Mario Loffredo wrote: > Il 27/04/2020 08:04, Patrick Mevzek ha scritto: > > Also: > > couldn't each fieldset have a list of jsonPath elements (similar to what is > > done in > > draft-ietf-regext-rdap-sorting-and-paging) > > to properly list the fields concerned? >