> Is it appropriate to use the urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:rdeObj[N] namespaces
> in the examples, vs. a dedicated "example" namespace?
You're probably right: there is an "example" namespace, and when a URN
is used purely as an example it should use that namespace.
Barry
_
> Section 5.1.3: "This element SHOULD be present in deposits of type Incremental
> or Differential." This makes it sound like a deposit of those two types not
> using this element might be non-compliant. I suggest instead "This element is
> only used in Incremental and Differential deposits." (O
Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-regext-data-escrow-07: Discuss
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to ht
Thanks Stewart. I entered a DISCUSS ballot concerning Section 11.
Alissa
> On Feb 28, 2020, at 6:30 AM, Stewart Bryant via Datatracker
> wrote:
>
> Reviewer: Stewart Bryant
> Review result: Ready
>
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART)
On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 6:45 AM Barry Leiba wrote:
> > Section 5.1.3: "This element SHOULD be present in deposits of type
> Incremental
> > or Differential." This makes it sound like a deposit of those two types
> not
> > using this element might be non-compliant. I suggest instead "This
> eleme
Gustavo,
I see that you have changed the Registrant contact in version 7 to "IETF
".
It should however be: "IESG "
- --
Antoin Verschuren
Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL
M: +31 6 37682392
> Op 7 apr. 2020, om 21:13 heeft Gustavo Lozano het
> volgende geschreven:
>
> Thank you Magnus,
