I don't view the need for the concrete report formats to be defined as
standards track RFCs, but instead define an IANA registry for the report
formats (e.g., common and optionally proprietary) based on a set of underlying
RFCs (format and report interfaces(s)). This is similar to what has been
Patrick,
Thank you for doing a detailed review of
draft-gould-casanova-regext-unhandled-namespaces and providing your feedback.
I respond to your feedback embedded below with a "JG - " prefix.
—
JG
James Gould
Distinguished Engineer
jgo...@verisign.com
703-948-3271
12061 Bluemont Way
R
Patrick,
Thanks from my side too for having implemented and put thought into this
draft! Here is my reply about the topics you brought up.
Reason:
"not in login services" could be translated to French in the lang="fr"
case. (Does anyone know of an implementation other than English ?!?)
ABNF:
