[regext] Privacy and HR considerations for draft-ietf-regext-verificationcode

2018-12-14 Thread Gurshabad Grover
Hi, Thank you for your comments on the proposed Human Rights Considerations section. Please find the draft text below (with an accompanying Privacy Considerations section which will also be useful); hope it is a good starting point for consensus. Privacy Considerations -- This

Re: [regext] draft-ietf-regext-verificationcode Feedback by Gurshabad Grover at REGEXT Meeting

2018-12-14 Thread Gurshabad Grover
On 07/11/18 11:30 AM, Gould, James wrote: > 1. Clarifying that it’s up to server policy to define the server action > taken when the verification code grace period expires > Thanks, JG; I see that -05 incorporates this change. > 2. Ensure that the VSP does not modify the data verified

Re: [regext] Privacy and HR considerations for draft-ietf-regext-verificationcode

2018-12-14 Thread John Levine
Having reviewed the proposed text, I would encourage the WG to ignore it. It is unhelpful, tendentious and a distraction from the WG's purpose. In the interest of not wasting any more time, this is my last message on the topic. R's, John In article <5f7d0b3e-c844-1700-c369-90bb41e82...@cis-indi

Re: [regext] Privacy and HR considerations for draft-ietf-regext-verificationcode

2018-12-14 Thread Adam Roach
[as an individual] While I might quibble about some of the specifics of the proposed text, I disagree with the characterization of "unhelpful." Both proposed sections, in fact, make an attempt to be actionable. In terms of tendentiousness, one could easily say the same of pretty much any "Se