Re: [regext] list of documents to consider for working group adoption

Thanks to Scott, James, and Tobias. The updated document list is included below. On 7 Dec 2018, at 9:38, James Galvin wrote: Included below is the list of potential documents and topics this working group could adopt. The first step in moving forward is to make sure we have a complete list

Re: [regext] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-regext-change-poll-10: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Benjamin, Thank you for your review and feedback. I provide responses to your feedback embedded below. — JG James Gould Distinguished Engineer jgo...@verisign.com 703-948-3271 12061 Bluemont Way Reston, VA 20190 Verisign.com On 12/7/18, 5:52 AM, "Benjamin K

Re: [regext] list of documents to consider for working group adoption

Jim, The following is already a REGEXT working group document: Verification Code https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-verificationcode/ The following can be moved to the ON HOLD PENDING EXTERNAL ACTIONS list: Login Security Policy (Extension of Registry Mapping) h

[regext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-regext-change-poll-11.txt

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Registration Protocols Extensions WG of the IETF. Title : Change Poll Extension for the Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) Authors : James Goul

Re: [regext] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-regext-change-poll-10: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Thanks; this sounds like a good path forward. I'll note that I'm on PTO this week, so I may be slow to respond to a new rev being issued. -Benjamin On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 04:48:18PM +, Gould, James wrote: > Benjamin, > > Thank you for your review and feedback. I provide responses to your

Re: [regext] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-regext-change-poll-10: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

On Mon, Dec 10, 2018, at 11:48, Gould, James wrote: > Section 2.3 > > "CSR" could expand to either "Customer Support Representative" or > "Certificate Signing Request" for some people. I don't know if there's > better name to suggest. > > JG - I believe the reference to "CSR"

Re: [regext] REGEXT Interim Meeting 2018OCT16

On Tue, Nov 27, 2018, at 11:28, Gould, James wrote: > > * Ensure that the hostAddr model of RFC 5731 is supported > > * > > *Discussion* > > * In the case of a zone that supports domain:hostAddr instead of >

[regext] =?UTF-8?Q?Re:__Tidbits_after_monday_meeting, _related_to_registry?= mapping extension => DOMAIN

Hello, Back in July I sent group of emails with details seen in the wild that may need to be in the extension, or not. I am only responding to this one about the form in fact and not the content, because I was kind of surprised by various points in the replies I got like: > How many registries

Re: [regext] list of documents to consider for working group adoption

Hello, Sorry to be probably again in the minority and the dissonant voice here, but I do not understand this: On Fri, Dec 7, 2018, at 10:49, James Galvin wrote: > The purpose of the list was to include everything that exists or that > has passed through the working group. I have to admit it wa