During the last IETF meeting we had a request to adopt another document.
As part of that discussion our AD expressed concern about the number
of documents currently on our list and the number of milestones
currently on our list.
The Chairs took an action to review both of these and we now hav
Good Morning,
Thanks Jim/Antoin for working through all of these documents.
I think these updates look good, except for a question on the reseller
documents. As I mentioned on list back in March, I thought in Seoul we decided
to review and comment but to not dedicate WG effort to these draf
Roger,
I don’t see the decision you outline in the minutes from IETF-97 (
https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/97/minutes/minutes-97-regext-00 ). Do you
know where that decision was captured?
Thanks,
—
JG
[cid:image001.png@01D2D097.A2071D20]
James Gould
Distinguished Engineer
jgo...@verisign.c
Good Morning,
Thanks for looking Jim. I am referring to this snipet (and memoryJ) from the
reseller discussion in the minutes:
“Jim Galvin (as Chair): WG has two roles: a) create extensions that several
people require, and standardize those b) just register the extension with IANA
- path to go
Roger,
Yes, I saw that reference as well, but I’m not sure whether a decision was made
to not dedicate WG effort on these drafts. As a co-author of the drafts, work
has continued to change them from reseller to organization based on the IETF-98
meeting and based on the discussions on the list.
