Re: [regext] draft-ietf-regext-epp-fees

2017-04-18 Thread Thomas Corte
Hello Roger, On 2017-03-29 16:05, Roger D Carney wrote: > Good Morning, > > We had a very productive meeting at our IETF-98 Monday session. > ... > > I have started work on v3 (0.17) of the draft with these changes in mind. I'm wondering about the status of this new draft version. Is there an

Re: [regext] draft-ietf-regext-epp-fees

2017-04-18 Thread Roger D Carney
Good Morning, Thanks for the note Thomas. We are working on the final edits this week and hope to have a draft posted within the week. Thanks Roger -Original Message- From: Thomas Corte [mailto:thomas.co...@knipp.de] Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2017 3:25 AM To: Roger D Carney ;

Re: [regext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-regext-verificationcode-01.txt

2017-04-18 Thread Niels ten Oever
Hi all, I just found out that this draft standards is already being approved by ICANN since February, which somehow seems a bit the wrong way around: https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/correspondence/papac-to-kane-27feb17-en.pdf I brought up on this list and in the past two sessions that this

Re: [regext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-regext-verificationcode-01.txt

2017-04-18 Thread Hollenbeck, Scott
> -Original Message- > From: regext [mailto:regext-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Niels ten Oever > Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2017 8:31 AM > To: regext@ietf.org > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-regext- > verificationcode-01.txt > > Hi all, > > I just found out that t

[regext] FW: I-D Action: draft-hollenbeck-regext-rdap-object-tag-03.txt

2017-04-18 Thread Hollenbeck, Scott
> -Original Message- > From: I-D-Announce [mailto:i-d-announce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of > internet-dra...@ietf.org > Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2017 8:34 AM > To: i-d-annou...@ietf.org > Subject: [EXTERNAL] I-D Action: draft-hollenbeck-regext-rdap-object-tag- > 03.txt > > > A New Intern

Re: [regext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-regext-verificationcode-01.txt

2017-04-18 Thread Gould, James
Niels comment in Chicago was related to the reseller drafts. Neils, if you have proposed text to add to draft-ietf-regext-verificationcode, please share it publically or privately. Thanks, — JG James Gould Distinguished Engineer jgo...@verisign.com 703-948-3271 12061 Bluemont Way Rest

Re: [regext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-regext-verificationcode-01.txt

2017-04-18 Thread Niels ten Oever
On 04/18/2017 02:41 PM, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote: >> -Original Message- From: regext >> [mailto:regext-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Niels ten Oever Sent: >> Tuesday, April 18, 2017 8:31 AM To: regext@ietf.org Subject: >> [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-regext- >> verificati

Re: [regext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-regext-verificationcode-01.txt

2017-04-18 Thread Niels ten Oever
Hi James, You're right. In Berlin I mentioned it in relation to the verification code draft (and brought up the statement about it [0]), but similar there are definitely also considerations for the resellers draft. Question is: should we create privacy considerations per draft, or would it make m

Re: [regext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-regext-verificationcode-01.txt

2017-04-18 Thread Hollenbeck, Scott
smime.p7m Description: S/MIME encrypted message ___ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext

Re: [regext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-regext-verificationcode-01.txt

2017-04-18 Thread Hollenbeck, Scott
(Sorry, resending due to a corporate mailer encryption setting user error on my part). > -Original Message- > From: Niels ten Oever [mailto:li...@digitaldissidents.org] > Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2017 9:29 AM > To: Gould, James ; Hollenbeck, Scott > ; 'regext@ietf.org' > Subject: [EXTERN