Re: [regext] Using RDAP as a Domain Availability Service

2017-04-05 Thread Thomas Corte
Hello Andrew, On 04/04/2017 21:31, Andrew Newton wrote: > I think it is also worth noting that not all TLDs are the same, and > many do not suffer from these issues and hence should not be held back > in this regard. While that's true, we should also be aware that e.g. ICANN has been requiring c

[regext] FW: I-D Action: draft-hollenbeck-regext-rdap-object-tag-02.txt

2017-04-05 Thread Hollenbeck, Scott
> -Original Message- > From: I-D-Announce [mailto:i-d-announce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of > internet-dra...@ietf.org > Sent: Wednesday, April 05, 2017 10:40 AM > To: i-d-annou...@ietf.org > Subject: [EXTERNAL] I-D Action: draft-hollenbeck-regext-rdap-object-tag- > 02.txt > > > A New Int

Re: [regext] [Ext] FW: I-D Action: draft-hollenbeck-regext-rdap-object-tag-02.txt

2017-04-05 Thread Francisco Arias
Hi Scott, I think the document should perhaps describe the problem that is being solved (one level higher). In other words, why would a RDAP use need to do an entity lookup if they don't know the registry the entity is related to. Perhaps I'm missing something, in my mind a user would want to k

Re: [regext] [Ext] FW: I-D Action: draft-hollenbeck-regext-rdap-object-tag-02.txt

2017-04-05 Thread Hollenbeck, Scott
> -Original Message- > From: Francisco Arias [mailto:francisco.ar...@icann.org] > Sent: Wednesday, April 05, 2017 1:11 PM > To: Hollenbeck, Scott ; 'regext@ietf.org' > > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [Ext] [regext] FW: I-D Action: draft-hollenbeck- > regext-rdap-object-tag-02.txt > > Hi Scott, >