Re: [regext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-regext-tmch-func-spec-00.txt

2016-10-12 Thread Patrik Fältström
On 11 Oct 2016, at 20:04, Gustavo Lozano wrote: > I reviewed the glossary, and with the update to the DNL definition in the > latest version, I don’t see any other term/acronym that is being redefined > from RFC7719. Please let me know if I missing any other term/acronym. Once again. You do not u

Re: [regext] Validate Extension (draft-carney-regext-validate-00)

2016-10-12 Thread Gould, James
Roger, I support your updated proposal of creating a Validate object extension with support for the check command and response. — JG James Gould Distinguished Engineer jgo...@verisign.com 703-948-3271 12061 Bluemont Way Reston, VA 20190 VerisignInc.com > O

Re: [regext] Gen-art LC (and telechat) review for draft-ietf-regext-epp-rdap-status-mapping-01

2016-10-12 Thread Gould, James
Robert, Thanks again for reviewing the draft and providing feedback. I reply to your replies below. — JG James Gould Distinguished Engineer jgo...@verisign.com 703-948-3271 12061 Bluemont Way Reston, VA 20190 VerisignInc.com > On Oct 11, 2016, at 12:00 PM, R

Re: [regext] Gen-art LC (and telechat) review for draft-ietf-regext-epp-rdap-status-mapping-01

2016-10-12 Thread Robert Sparks
On 10/12/16 9:27 AM, Gould, James wrote: Robert, Thanks again for reviewing the draft and providing feedback. I reply to your replies below. — JG *James Gould *Distinguished Engineer jgo...@verisign.com 703-948-3271 12061 Bluemont Way Reston, VA 20190 VerisignInc.com

Re: [regext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-regext-tmch-func-spec-00.txt

2016-10-12 Thread Alissa Cooper
I am just now wading into this since Alexey has passed shepherding duties onto me for this group and this is not my area of expertise so please feel free to correct me. It seems to me there is a fairly straightforward resolution to the reference issue. As pointed out below, the only reason tha

[regext] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-regext-epp-rdap-status-mapping-02: (with COMMENT)

2016-10-12 Thread Ben Campbell
Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-regext-epp-rdap-status-mapping-02: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Pl

[regext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-regext-epp-rdap-status-mapping-03.txt

2016-10-12 Thread internet-drafts
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Registration Protocols Extensions of the IETF. Title : Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) and Registration Data Access Protocol (RDAP) Status Mapping Aut

Re: [regext] Gen-art LC (and telechat) review for draft-ietf-regext-epp-rdap-status-mapping-01

2016-10-12 Thread Gould, James
Robert, I posted draft-ietf-regext-epp-rdap-status-mapping-03 that incorporates the remainder of your feedback. Let me know if you find anything else. Thanks, — JG James Gould Distinguished Engineer jgo...@verisign.com 703-948-3271 12061 Bluemont Way Reston, VA 20190 VerisignInc.com <

[regext] WG I-Ds in the IANA EPP Extensions Registry

2016-10-12 Thread Gustavo Lozano
Hello colleagues, The gTLD base registry agreement requires Registries to provide and update the relevant documentation of all the EPP Objects and Extensions supported to ICANN prior to deployment. Currently, in order to comply with this provision, Registries upload their documentation through a

Re: [regext] Gen-art LC (and telechat) review for draft-ietf-regext-epp-rdap-status-mapping-01

2016-10-12 Thread Jari Arkko
Many thanks Robert for the review, and thank you James for the edits. Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext