The WGLC for this document is now closed.
The Chairs do not believe this document is ready for publication.
Unfortunately, a number of items were brought up during the last call
that have not received enough discussion to resolve.
This document will remain a working group document.
The auth
...@verisign.com
703-948-3271
12061 Bluemont Way
Reston, VA 20190
Verisign.com<http://verisigninc.com/>
From: Jody Kolker
Date: Friday, October 23, 2020 at 5:16 PM
To: "regext@ietf.org" , James Gould ,
"gal...@elistx.com"
Subject: RE: [regext] WG LAST CALL:
draft-ietf-regex
The Chairs would like to extend this WG Last Call for an additional two
weeks, to close on Friday, 30 October 2020.
Although there have been 2 indications of support, James Gould provided
some extensive comments, most of which have been addressed in version
-04 of the document. However, Jody
CALL:
draft-ietf-regext-epp-registry-maintenance-03
Notice: This email is from an external sender.
Hi,
I did a review of draft-ietf-regext-epp-registry-maintenance and the following
is my feedback:
1. Section 1.1 Terminology and Definition
* Since the draft has moved to WGLC
Thanks for the feedback Jim! We are reviewing and will get back to you
From: regext On Behalf Of Gould, James
Sent: Thursday, October 8, 2020 7:55 AM
To: gal...@elistx.com; regext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [regext] WG LAST CALL:
draft-ietf-regext-epp-registry-maintenance-03
Notice: This email is
Reston, VA 20190
Verisign.com<http://verisigninc.com/>
From: regext on behalf of "Gould, James"
Date: Tuesday, October 6, 2020 at 3:27 PM
To: "gal...@elistx.com" , "regext@ietf.org"
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] WG LAST CALL:
draft-ietf-regext-epp-regi
Hi,
I did a review of draft-ietf-regext-epp-registry-maintenance and the following
is my feedback:
1. Section 1.1 Terminology and Definition
* Since the draft has moved to WGLC, this is somewhat a non-applicable
point, but the latest practice for EPP extensions has been to use a p
Hi all,
I have a couple of comments about this document:
1) Don't understand which maintenance notifications should be returned
by an info command including the element. I mean, only
those about both ongoing and future events or also about past events? In
the latter case, could it be helpf
+1
From: regext on behalf of Tobias Sattler
Sent: Monday, October 5, 2020 6:23 AM
To: James Galvin
Cc: regext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [regext] WG LAST CALL:
draft-ietf-regext-epp-registry-maintenance-03
Notice: This email is from an external sender.
+1
+1
> On 2. Oct 2020, at 22:57, James Galvin wrote:
>
> The following working group document is believed to be ready for submission
> to the IESG for publication as a standards track document:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-epp-registry-maintenance/
>
> This WG last cal
10 matches
Mail list logo
