On Mon, 2016-06-06 at 21:16 +0200, Andrew Newton wrote:
> As for the RDAP portion, there is an existing 'links' JSON structure
> which you may also leverage instead of creating a new structure. If
> you are just providing links, that may be easier. If you need
> additional data, then a separate str
Thanks Andrew,
This seems more appropriate indeed - For now the only additional
data/property we were thinking of, was to maybe identify "embeddable"
documentation as opposed to service URIs.
After reading a bit more of RFC5988 I think we can try using an
extension relation type URI, if that make
Hi Pascal,
This is an interesting idea.
As for the RDAP portion, there is an existing 'links' JSON structure
which you may also leverage instead of creating a new structure. If
you are just providing links, that may be easier. If you need
additional data, then a separate structure is probably app
