Re: [regext] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-regext-rfc7484bis-02.txt

Hi Jim- I support both but the focus on my email was to provide a +1 support for registry-maintenance -Jothan On Mon, May 3, 2021 at 5:59 AM James Galvin wrote: > Jothan, > > Your message is confusing. > > The subject of the message suggests you’re supporting rfc7484bis, but the > content of

Re: [regext] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-regext-rfc7484bis-02.txt

Jothan, Your message is confusing. The subject of the message suggests you’re supporting rfc7484bis, but the content of the message is all about registry-maintenance. Would you please clarify your support? Thanks, Jim On 15 Apr 2021, at 12:50, Jothan Frakes wrote: +1draft-ietf-rege

Re: [regext] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-regext-rfc7484bis-02.txt

+1draft-ietf-regext-epp-registry-maintenance looks good to me Just to be clear, since this is a 2nd WGLC, the new WGLC is for > draft-ietf-regext-epp-registry-maintenance-12 > > Op 29 mrt. 2021, om 14:49 heeft Antoin Verschuren > <> het volgende geschreven: > > > > The foll

Re: [regext] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-regext-rfc7484bis-02.txt

On 29 Mar 2021, at 9:36, Antoin Verschuren wrote: Marc, just to let you know: waiting for a response to Jasdip's comment to see if we need a new version before issuing a wglc. thanks for the reminder. Added the note per Jasdip request and created -03. just posted. Regards, Marc. Regards,