Thanks for all the comments and explanations. I'll update the drafts as soon as
possible.
Regards,
Linlin
zhoulin...@cnnic.cn
From: Adam Roach
Date: 2018-08-22 03:14
To: Gould, James; Linlin Zhou
CC: regext
Subject: Re: [regext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-regext-org-09.txt
James --
Thank
August 21, 2018 at 2:07 PM
*To: *Linlin Zhou , James Gould
*Cc: *regext
*Subject: *[EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] I-D Action:
draft-ietf-regext-org-09.txt
If that's what the working group intends, then it's okay to move
forward with the document. It's rather unlike the localization
a
...@verisign.com
703-948-3271
12061 Bluemont Way
Reston, VA 20190
Verisign.com<http://verisigninc.com/>
From: Adam Roach
Date: Tuesday, August 21, 2018 at 2:07 PM
To: Linlin Zhou , James Gould
Cc: regext
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-regext-org-09.txt
If that'
<mailto:jgould=40verisign@dmarc.ietf.org>
*Date:* 2018-08-21 11:17
*To:* Linlin Zhou <mailto:zhoulin...@cnnic.cn>
*CC:* Adam Roach <mailto:a...@nostrum.com>; regext
<mailto:regext@ietf.org>
*Subject:* Re: [regext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-regext-org-09.txt
L
Dear AD,
If we keep it consistent with other EPP RFCs and remove the maxOcuurs value,
what's your opinion?
Regards
Linlin
zhoulin...@cnnic.cn
From: Gould, James
Date: 2018-08-21 11:17
To: Linlin Zhou
CC: Adam Roach; regext
Subject: Re: [regext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-regext-org-09.txt
L
our comments.
Regards,
Linlin
zhoulin...@cnnic.cn<mailto:zhoulin...@cnnic.cn>
From: Gould, James<mailto:jgo...@verisign.com>
Date: 2018-08-20 20:31
To: Linlin Zhou<mailto:zhoulin...@cnnic.cn>; Adam
Roach<mailto:a...@nostrum.com>; regext<
tent with
the other EPP mappings by being an optional single element.
—
JG
James Gould
Distinguished Engineer
jgo...@verisign.com
703-948-3271
12061 Bluemont Way
Reston, VA 20190
Verisign.com
From: regext on behalf of Linlin Zhou
Date: Monday, August 20, 2018 at 12:12 AM
To: Adam Roac
nday, August 20, 2018 at 12:12 AM
To: Adam Roach , regext
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-regext-org-09.txt
Hi,
The org drafts have been submitted to address the comments discussed before.
Thanks for all your comments and explanations.
1. comment for changing the name o
jgo...@verisign.com
703-948-3271
12061 Bluemont Way
Reston, VA 20190
Verisign.com<http://verisigninc.com/>
From: regext on behalf of Linlin Zhou
Date: Monday, August 20, 2018 at 12:12 AM
To: Adam Roach , regext
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-regext-org-09.txt
H
nlin Zhou
Date: Monday, August 20, 2018 at 12:12 AM
To: Adam Roach , regext
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-regext-org-09.txt
Hi,
The org drafts have been submitted to address the comments discussed before.
Thanks for all your comments and explanations.
1. comment for chan
Hi,
The org drafts have been submitted to address the comments discussed before.
Thanks for all your comments and explanations.
1. comment for changing the name of to "roID"
We reread RFC5730 and found that has been already defined, so we did
not change the name of to "roID" to keep consisten
11 matches
Mail list logo
