Patrick,
I support this fix. Fixing an invalid XML schema is a perfectly legitimate
change to draft-ietf-regext-epp-fees, that we needs to be done ahead of it
moving forward. I don't see why there would be an issue with fixing this or
any other invalid content (e.g., invalid XML examples).
On Sun, Nov 4, 2018, at 16:35, Roger D Carney wrote:
> A small updated was needed, implementers found the "standard" attribute
> was not at the correct level in the commandDataType.
As expected and said previously, this late addition without any clear support
from anyone except the initial re
Good Morning,
A small updated was needed, implementers found the "standard" attribute was not
at the correct level in the commandDataType.
Thanks
Roger
-Original Message-
From: regext On Behalf Of internet-dra...@ietf.org
Sent: Sunday, November 4, 2018 9:31 AM
To: i-d-annou...@ietf.o
