Re: [regext] FW: Incompatibility between RFC 8521 and RFC 7484

2019-11-07 Thread Hollenbeck, Scott
I just submitted an errata report for this. Scott > -Original Message- > From: Andrew Newton > Sent: Friday, October 25, 2019 10:06 AM > To: Hollenbeck, Scott > Cc: p...@dotandco.com; regext@ietf.org > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] FW: Incompatibility between RFC 8

Re: [regext] FW: Incompatibility between RFC 8521 and RFC 7484

2019-10-25 Thread Andrew Newton
ott > > > -Original Message- > > From: regext On Behalf Of Patrick Mevzek > > Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2019 2:02 AM > > To: regext@ietf.org > > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] FW: Incompatibility between RFC 8521 and > > RFC 7484 > > > > >

Re: [regext] FW: Incompatibility between RFC 8521 and RFC 7484

2019-10-25 Thread Hollenbeck, Scott
al contact information. Scott > -Original Message- > From: regext On Behalf Of Patrick Mevzek > Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2019 2:02 AM > To: regext@ietf.org > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] FW: Incompatibility between RFC 8521 and > RFC 7484 > > > > On Tue, O

Re: [regext] FW: Incompatibility between RFC 8521 and RFC 7484

2019-10-15 Thread Patrick Mevzek
On Tue, Oct 15, 2019, at 10:17, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote: > FYI, folks. Does anyone have any thoughts on the better path forward? Between: 1) Publish errata for 8521 noting that "The bootstrap service registry for the RDAP service provider space is represented using the structure specified in S