Re: [regext] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7484 (5460)

2018-08-14 Thread Hollenbeck, Scott
.com; wei...@ietf.org > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7484 > (5460) > > Hello, > thanks for reporting this. The original text was meant as some possible > guidance on what to do for the implementor. However, the use of may and > could in th

Re: [regext] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7484 (5460)

2018-08-14 Thread Marc Blanchet
Hello, thanks for reporting this. The original text was meant as some possible guidance on what to do for the implementor. However, the use of may and could in the text shows clearly that this is just one possibility, leaving the implementor more complex implementation algorithm. I’m not sure