Re: [regext] question regarding status draft-ietf-regext-bundling-registration

2016-12-21 Thread Jiankang Yao
From: Marc Blanchet Date: 2016-12-03 05:09 To: James Galvin CC: Registration Protocols Extensions Subject: Re: [regext] question regarding status draft-ietf-regext-bundling-registration >I have said on the mike two meetings ago that there are multiple >bundling drafts and instead of havin

Re: [regext] question regarding status draft-ietf-regext-bundling-registration

2016-12-02 Thread Marc Blanchet
I have said on the mike two meetings ago that there are multiple bundling drafts and instead of having many, the co-authors should work on a common framework/document. There has been some initial communications between them offline but more to come. I would suggest that we shall work towards a

[regext] question regarding status draft-ietf-regext-bundling-registration

2016-12-02 Thread James Galvin
This document has been on hold because of the potentially related work expected to take place if the recent DNSBUNDLED BOF should become a working group. The action at the end of the BOF was to ask for a revised problem statement that more clearly stated the work that would be considered by t