Re: [regext] implementation status of organization extension

2017-09-18 Thread Gould, James
istrar does not own. Thanks, Jody Kolker From: Rubens Kuhl [mailto:rube...@nic.br] Sent: Monday, September 18, 2017 7:12 AM To: Gould, James Cc: Jody Kolker ; James Galvin ; Linlin Zhou ; regext Subject: Re: [regext] implementation status of organization extension Isn't the sponsorin

Re: [regext] implementation status of organization extension

2017-09-18 Thread Jody Kolker
not own. Thanks, Jody Kolker From: Rubens Kuhl [mailto:rube...@nic.br] Sent: Monday, September 18, 2017 7:12 AM To: Gould, James Cc: Jody Kolker ; James Galvin ; Linlin Zhou ; regext Subject: Re: [regext] implementation status of organization extension Isn't the sponsoring registrar al

Re: [regext] implementation status of organization extension

2017-09-18 Thread Gould, James
mailto:zhoulin...@cnnic.cn>> Cc: regext mailto:regext@ietf.org>> Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: [regext] implementation status of organization extension Hi Jim, We do not have any intention at this time of implementing this draft. We have no desire to send reseller information to the registry

Re: [regext] implementation status of organization extension

2017-09-18 Thread Rubens Kuhl
> Galvin mailto:gal...@elistx.com>>, Linlin Zhou > mailto:zhoulin...@cnnic.cn>> > Cc: regext mailto:regext@ietf.org>> > Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: [regext] implementation status of organization > extension > > Hi Jim, > > We do not have any intention at this

Re: [regext] implementation status of organization extension

2017-09-18 Thread Gould, James
regext Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: [regext] implementation status of organization extension Hi Jim, We do not have any intention at this time of implementing this draft. We have no desire to send reseller information to the registry due to competition concerns. We believe there is no reason for the re

Re: [regext] implementation status of organization extension

2017-09-15 Thread Rubens Kuhl
t; Sent: Friday, August 25, 2017 9:14 AM > To: James Galvin ; Linlin Zhou > Cc: regext > Subject: Re: [regext] implementation status of organization extension > > Jim, > > There is one additional potential use is for providing registrar information > in suppor

Re: [regext] implementation status of organization extension

2017-09-15 Thread Jody Kolker
[mailto:regext-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Gould, James Sent: Friday, August 25, 2017 9:14 AM To: James Galvin ; Linlin Zhou Cc: regext Subject: Re: [regext] implementation status of organization extension Jim, There is one additional potential use is for providing registrar information in

Re: [regext] implementation status of organization extension

2017-08-25 Thread Gould, James
Reston, VA 20190 Verisign.com<http://verisigninc.com/> From: regext on behalf of James Galvin Date: Friday, August 25, 2017 at 9:47 AM To: Linlin Zhou Cc: regext Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] implementation status of organization extension At least two potential uses of these draft

Re: [regext] implementation status of organization extension

2017-08-25 Thread James Galvin
At least two potential uses of these drafts have been identified by this group: for resellers and for DNS operators. It would be very helpful if folks from those communities would make a point of reviewing these documents and consider supporting them or at least indicating you have no objectio

[regext] implementation status of organization extension

2017-08-21 Thread Linlin Zhou
Dear all, To support WG's suggestion, the organization extension drafts plan to add a section on implementation status. If you have already implemented organization extention, know of any existing implementations or planned implementations, please send me a mail for us to update the drafts. Any