Hi Murray,
We double-checked and did a final update. From the authors' perspective, we are
good to move on.
Thanks,
Tobias
> On 10. Oct 2021, at 09:55, Tobias Sattler wrote:
>
> Hi Murray,
>
> Thank you. While we have addressed all comments in version 18, we will
> double-check and get back
Hi Murray,
Thank you. While we have addressed all comments in version 18, we will
double-check and get back to you.
Best,
Tobias
> On 10. Oct 2021, at 08:05, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
>
> Sounds good. Just to confirm: This is the version you would like to send to
> the RFC Editor, correct?
Sounds good. Just to confirm: This is the version you would like to send
to the RFC Editor, correct? There was a lot of non-DISCUSS feedback from
other Area Directors, and I was wondering if you plan to incorporate any of
their feedback, or perhaps -18 already contains all of that?
None of it is
Thank you, Murray.
We have updated it to v18 and looking forward to moving on.
Best,
Tobias
> On 6. Oct 2021, at 07:47, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
>
> No, I was not aware, sorry. I missed Tobias' earlier message.
>
> Please wait until after the telechat to post -18. You'll see its state
>
No, I was not aware, sorry. I missed Tobias' earlier message.
Please wait until after the telechat to post -18. You'll see its state
change to "IESG Evaluation::Revised I-D Needed", and that'll be your signal
to proceed.
-MSK
On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 6:34 AM Antoin Verschuren wrote:
> Murray,
Hi Murray,
We have prepared a new version (v18) on GitHub
(https://github.com/seitsu/registry-epp-maintenance/blob/master/draft-ietf-regext-epp-registry-maintenance.txt).
The new version addresses the feedback from Harald (ARTART).
We also got the go-ahead from the IANA experts.
We can do this
